tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25163458.post3368603667597983487..comments2023-10-31T05:09:58.639-04:00Comments on maribo: The climate science filibusterUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25163458.post-30652821492777391252011-02-24T18:20:28.328-05:002011-02-24T18:20:28.328-05:00Excellent response, professor Donner. The problem ...Excellent response, professor Donner. The problem with dogmatic naysayers, as you doubtless know, is that they fear objective criticism and rely almost entirely on unsubstantiated assertions and misdirection. <br /><br />Theirs is a political/religious crusade, and as such thier "arguments" cannot withstand scientific scrutiny. <br /><br />We see the same phenomenon in those who denigrate and marginalize informed criticism of the World Trade Centre implosion.Greg Feltonhttp://www.gregfelton.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25163458.post-17225225595854487282009-10-29T16:31:22.477-04:002009-10-29T16:31:22.477-04:00Notice I did not say that McIntrye's arguments...Notice I did not say that McIntrye's arguments are illegitimate - I said some in fact may in fact be. The point is this: If scientists fail to respond to an online criticism in a timely fashion, they are not necessarily "running from" or "ignoring" the criticism. it is quite likely they are busy teaching, doing university service work, or conducting research. <br /><br />If McIntrye or others wish for a response, rather than flood the net with volumes and volumes of hit-and-miss analysis and commentary, put the statistical analysis into a concise paper and submit it to a journal. The system is there to filter things. Some of his work may have validity, and would be published.Simon Donnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01844831377442275615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25163458.post-32870914597572511212009-10-29T10:16:31.970-04:002009-10-29T10:16:31.970-04:00LOL this article is joke, right?
The tree ring dat...LOL this article is joke, right?<br />The tree ring data is being used to establish temperatures from the past based on the growth rates being correlated to CO2. Please tell me you understand how biased figures corrupt the process?<br /><br />Climate audit raises legitimate questions. Running from and ignoring valid criticisms makes your science look weak.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com